http://rdfa.info/2007/12/02/embedding-owl-rdfs-syntax-in-xhtml-with-rdfa-embedding-owl-rdfs-syntax-in-xhtml-with-rdfa/ Interoperable Web Metadata Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:32:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://rdfa.info/2007/12/02/embedding-owl-rdfs-syntax-in-xhtml-with-rdfa-embedding-owl-rdfs-syntax-in-xhtml-with-rdfa/comment-page-1/#comment-19825 Recent Links Tagged With "rdfs" - JabberTags Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:34:34 +0000 http://rdfa.info/2007/12/02/embedding-owl-rdfs-syntax-in-xhtml-with-rdfa-embedding-owl-rdfs-syntax-in-xhtml-with-rdfa/#comment-19825 [...] Web for the Working Ontologist: Effective Modeling in ... Saved by gtsstl on Mon 08-12-2008 Embedding OWL-RDFS syntax in XHTML with RDFa Saved by bedzz on Tue 02-12-2008 wikipedia - Semantic Web Saved by vodkashots on Mon 01-12-2008 [...] [...] Web for the Working Ontologist: Effective Modeling in … Saved by gtsstl on Mon 08-12-2008 Embedding OWL-RDFS syntax in XHTML with RDFa Saved by bedzz on Tue 02-12-2008 wikipedia – Semantic Web Saved by vodkashots on Mon 01-12-2008 [...]

]]> http://rdfa.info/2007/12/02/embedding-owl-rdfs-syntax-in-xhtml-with-rdfa-embedding-owl-rdfs-syntax-in-xhtml-with-rdfa/comment-page-1/#comment-9953 hendler Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:53:39 +0000 http://rdfa.info/2007/12/02/embedding-owl-rdfs-syntax-in-xhtml-with-rdfa-embedding-owl-rdfs-syntax-in-xhtml-with-rdfa/#comment-9953 Forgive me, but this seems somewhat confused to me - seems like it would be better to define the OWL in another file, and have the markup that includes OWL be used to create instances - which makes it just using RDFa to do RDF which is a relatively clean process. One could then include an imports statement or a seeAlso (I admit getting the instance data and the ontology read in at the same time is still a bit of a black art) - but defining a restriction within the RDFa seems to me to be doing a lot of extra work for little gain. I'm a big fan of RDFa (and GRDDL) and some OWL for that matter, but OWL was defined based on URIs in part to make it easy to define the classes and properties in one place and use them in another - which seems to me what David is trying to do. (Note that I would have left direct feedback there, but to do so would have meant joining yet another googlegroup, where I'm already drowning in email... -J Hendler Forgive me, but this seems somewhat confused to me – seems like it would be better to define the OWL in another file, and have the markup that includes OWL be used to create instances – which makes it just using RDFa to do RDF which is a relatively clean process. One could then include an imports statement or a seeAlso (I admit getting the instance data and the ontology read in at the same time is still a bit of a black art) – but defining a restriction within the RDFa seems to me to be doing a lot of extra work for little gain. I’m a big fan of RDFa (and GRDDL) and some OWL for that matter, but OWL was defined based on URIs in part to make it easy to define the classes and properties in one place and use them in another – which seems to me what David is trying to do.
(Note that I would have left direct feedback there, but to do so would have meant joining yet another googlegroup, where I’m already drowning in email…
-J Hendler

]]>